Personal
interpretation - when a messenger sends a message with undefined terms,
the receiver fills in void with personal interpretation. Your
definition, not mine or Webster’s, but yours. YOUR DICTIONARY should be
your best friend. I wrote mine and please do not accept my
definitions. They are there so you know what I mean when I send a
message and use those terms. Yet, please tell me what you mean when you
use those terms. But don't waste my time if you don’t know what your
message means or have spent your time.
Another
word scientist cannot agree on is essential. Essential elements - they
can’t agree on what essential means and nobody has told us what
essential means here either. Did list things expected to close and
things mandated open but no one told us what they mean when they use the
word “essential”. They can’t so they need to stop using words they
cannot define. Or it is noise with stimulating “personal
interpretation” by listeners or those receiving messages trying to do
what humans do, try to fill in blanks to complete the circle. It’s not
the same as misspelled words. I.e., if the first and last letter are in
place the receiver possibly can get it. Real bad, I.e., noise.
John A. Keslick Jr.![]()
![]()
![]()
Tree Biologist
Contact
Dictionary
MAIN
PAGE
Text & Graphics Copyright © 2020 Keslick & Son Modern Arboriculture
Please report web site problems, comments and words of interest,
not found.
Contact