1. ABSTRACT. In order to understand a system containing trees, its
parts and processes above as well as below ground, one must examine such
a system, which is in a state least tampered with - containing most parts
as well as processes, if not all. E.g., you need to know what parts
and processes the system of a new car has, if you are going to take a used
one and restore it. E. G., if your car does not stop than it would
be wise to know that the car (system) was designed with brakes. This
is also true above as well as below ground, for a system known as a forest,
and coarse woody debris (CWD). Most people, if asked, would claim to
know what a sick tree looks like. But, how many understand a healthy tree
system.
2. The Mississippi Valley Laboratory in St. Louis was established in 1899.
Dr. Herman von Schrenk was the director. Studies on wood decay and
discoloration were done mostly. In time, the studies drifted toward
wood products. In 1907 the lab was discontinued and the Forest Products
Laboratory at Madison, Wisconsin took over. The major focus of the
lab was on wood products decay. Tree biology never had a chance (SHIGO,
1999).
3. Tree Biology is the science that brings together anatomy, physiology,
genetics, evolution, ecology, and all other disciplines that focus on the
life of a tree system (redundant, the tree is a system) and how death brings
healthier life. In spite of abiotic destructive forces and biotic agents
such as insects, bacteria, and fungi, humans still rank as the major destructive
agent for trees in forests and cities. Ignorance of tree biology is
a major cause of this (SHIGO, 1999). Ignorance of tree biology has
been, and still is, the major cause of tree problems worldwide (SHIGO, 1999).
Franklin, et. al. (1987) pg. 552-553 reports - Both insects and disease
may be the proximate agent of death in trees already weakened by other factors;
as such, they are often blamed for deaths more properly assigned elsewhere.
“Humans are, of course, a major biotic cause of tree death, acting both directly
(tree removing) and indirectly influencing almost all other agents.”
4. A serious problem is the communication of knowledge and needs between
forest researchers and practicing foresters (SHIGO, 1977) as published in
Northern Logger and Timber Processor. The information I am presenting
in this paper will be published, reviewed data by researchers and scientist.
Several being powerful, USDA Forest Service General Technical Reports.
My target here, is to present technical information addressing current half
truths and misconceptions on symplastless tree stems (mistakenly called dead
trees – perceived as worthless) and their unique characteristics which enhance
the lives and connections of forest occupants dictating health, above as
well as below ground.
5. The teams of Practicing Foresters, with respect to the “Burn and Clearcut
Project” on the ANF, are faced with the responsibility of decision making
on a large-scale area. Many critical processes and connections are at stake.
An area, which demands decisions, based on tree biology, above as well as
below ground, not feelings. I find it “alarming” that the decision
making team does not have a tree biologist, neither does the team from the
US FISH and WILDLIFE SERVICE, pertaining to this project and the endangered
species, connections and processes. Trying to treat what you do not
understand is the same as trying to start a Rolls Royce by hitting it with
a sledgehammer (SHIGO, 1999). To say the least, there is some missing
links. Did you ever examine someone who does not understand tree anatomy
prune a stem? (I have provided samples) This type of management is what I
see in this project. Something to think about - Would you go to a doctor
who flunked anatomy (SHIGO, 1999)?
6. With respect, man’s intervention to log, to control forest health, is
absurd. Storms, fires, floods, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions
keep reminding people that they are not the boss.
7. Board-feet seems to be the teams only specialty. I believe the law
requires high quality materials. The anatomy of different trees and
their environment from which they grow, greatly dictates the quality of material.
All parts of a tree are born alive. A trees environment, used for violin
wood, dictates the sound of the violin. Each cell is born alive.
The type of wood a specific species can produce such as heartwood, false-heartwood,
wetwood, discolored wood (basic anatomy) greatly determines lumber degrade
factors and the quality they are responsible for. They just do not
maintain those or types of records on the ANF (per East Side comments).
We still are plagued with the heartrot concept that is based on the misconception
that wood is dead – not true. What is true is that the heartrot concept
has been replaced with the understanding of CODIT – Compartmentalization
Of Decay In Trees. Compartmentalization is the tree's defense process
where boundaries form that resist spread of infections and that defend the
liquid transport, energy storage, and mechanical support systems.
8. Also the use of a SHIGOMETER is not considered. A SHIGOMETER can
measures the chemically altered tissues within a tree. Material with
high probability of termite predisposition can be easily detected with an
understanding of tree anatomy and experience with the machine. Which
may well, in the Forest Plan, be considered low or high quality. Thus
I would testify they have not done all they can to provide high quality material
and or decipher between high or low quality. There is a difference
between having a lot of trees and having a lot of high quality trees.
9. Again, to bring some understanding in on this, A SHIGOMETER is not
a sophisticated device. It is a pulsed ohmmeter. It gives you
numbers. A SHIGOMETER also measures Cambium Electrical Resistance thus
determining the health of the symplast and can be used in tree farming selection
of trees too cut. But to understand what these numbers mean, it demands
you have an understanding of tree anatomy, which the team does, not – why?
The lack of understanding of tree anatomy, CODIT and tree biology, does not
reduce the importance of its use, in the decision-making, in a project such
as this, nor does it reduce the penalty for continued physical abuse.
Our forefathers did not know, just as with DNA. NOW WE KNOW.
10. Here, as in all Medicine, the first principle must be: "FIRST OF ALL
DO NO HARM!" This implies, of course, a thorough understanding of the healthy
organism, i.e. in this case, the tree biology. This, in turn, brings us to
a second principle: "DON'T HURT THE TREE AND YOU WON'T HURT YOURSELF!" An
unbelievable example is about a fellow who for twenty years engaged in the
practice of drilling holes into trees and injecting pesticides and fungicides.
Well, he did not help the trees, but he developed such severe bone cancer
that at the end of his life he could not visit his trees anymore. (Per phone
conversation with fellow). I wonder if a thoracic surgeon would do a heart
transplant only because the patient wants it?
11. No measures or to say the most, minimum safe guards have been taken here
to reduce injuries to the system. Technical reports do state we need
to separate our forest from the tree farms. I remain optimistic and
look forward to helping tree farmers understand the needs of their trees.
12. Trees are the most massive, longest-lived organisms to ever live on this
planet (Shigo, 1994)! From this once fertile forest – this is exactly
what is planned, to be removed. The most massive – longest lived –
organisms, which are key players in the system health. The ecological
stages of trees play a very, very large key role in the health and maintenance
of the soil.
13. Again, the decision making team has missed at least one of three major
aspects of the removal of the ecological stages of trees from this once fertile
forest. The lack of understanding of the wood types (heartwood, false heartwood,
discolored wood, etc.) and their lack of data on optimum fertility levels
for plants in this once fertile forest, alone, denotes their extremely weak
understanding of this system and the affects of their prescribed treatments
now and into the future.
14. The removal of trees in their different ecological stages from the once
fertile forest does greatly affect the lives of entire groups of organisms
(flora, fauna) above and below ground. Too often in the decision making process,
concepts that do not facilitate system health are used to calculate treatments.
These treatments out of the ignorance of tree biology can and do have affects
on entire groups of organisms. Tree Biology is too often over looked
in the goal of the production of board feet. This paper is intended
as a wake up call and surly not to be considered the last word on the topic.
The more you learn about what you are seeking, the better the chances are
that you will find it (SHIGO, 1999). Many foresters do seek to restore
ecological order, but do not know how, yet!
15. Certainly our knowledge of biological processes and their interactions
within forest is incomplete, and we know too little about the cumulative
effect of a wide range of stresses on the ecosystem. But integrative research
at the ecosystem level shows clearly that the many processes operating within
forest inter-connect in important ways. Further, diversity of microscopic
and macroscopic plant and animal species is a key factor in maintaining these
processes (Maser, Tarrant, Trappe and Franklin, 1988, pg1-par2).
16. Logging is reducing spatial, chemical, and biotic diversity of forest
soils, and the processes that maintain long-term forest productivity (Maser,
Tarrant, Trappe and Franklin, 1988,pg1-par1).
17.
Just because I list a page and paragraph where data can
be found, does not mean that its the only place in the document where it is
discussed.
Text & Graphics Copyright © 2004 Keslick & Son Modern Arboriculture
Please report web site problems, comments and words of interest, not understood.
John A. Keslick, Jr.
Contact